[CII] welcome to the public CII
Gareth Eason
gareth.eason at signal2noise.ie
Tue Dec 1 09:10:49 UTC 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Gadi Evron wrote:
> Michael Maranda wrote:
>> One of the prior messages articulated an aversion to Cyber as
>> non-word. Please say more? For now I'll take it as similar to my
>> aversion to prefixing everything with e-; i; and "digital"
>
> You got it. Just that most of us gave up and use it until the trend is
> over. It's difficult to explain to people why most "cyber-war" stories
> are nonsense when they don't understand other terminology.
[snip]
Without 'cyber' we cannot have Doctor Who and his epic battle against
the 'cybermen.' It might be a little UK-centric but perhaps some of the
US subscribers have experienced Doctor Who - or at least heard of it. So
end of discuss - 'cyber' MUST stay in the dictionary, at least until the
last of the Time Lords can declare a definitive victory over them ;-)
More seriously, cyber-, e-, i-, digital- and other equally misused
prefixes are bad for language, detract from clarity of language, but are
a very real exponent of any developing language in active use. We've
already lost the battle for 'hacker'/'cracker' and apart from September
19th any words derived from 'pirate' are utterly meaningless.
Let's move on to discussion of the real issues of Critical Internet
Infrastructure - the semantics of the English language (while
interesting) are discussed at great length elsewhere ;-)
I'd very much like to get some opinions from the group as to where
priorities lie re infrastructure, particularly with respect to:
- availability
- reliability
- openness
- neutrality
- freedom/freedoms (for ISPs? for end-users?)
- oversight (for government? for ISPs? for regulatory bodies?)
In a similar vein, I'd like to see some discussion on whether people
see regulation as an 'answer', and whether (ISPs?) see self-regulation
or governmental (or other third-party) regulation as required? Optional?
Optimal?
Thoughts?
Best regards,
-->Gar (not a bot ;-) )
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAksU3YsACgkQK36C50PvIR/ONwCdHf9CfT4fQHkS9Bs2JaeLaMGC
KUcAn2BCale8V0olR65AwgA40U2wCAGj
=QJRf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the CII
mailing list