[CII] End2End (was) terms and conditions

[Dan Kaminsky]

Since it's not often understood, the reason you go end to end is then
you have only two endpoints to fix, both of which are motivated to fix
the problem, rather than a million endpoints to fix, most of which you
can't even identify.

On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Barry Raveendran Greene
<bgreene at senki.org> wrote:
>
>
>> one of the often misunderstood attributes of an IP network
>> is the basic attribute of the End2End principle.  e.g.
>> the network can and perhaps should be decomposed on a periodic
>> basis...  there is nothing sacrosanct about any given IP network
>> or set of interconnects between any set of IP networks.
>
> Given that this comment was lost, I think it is worth bringing up and
> highlighting. My personal experience working "CII" with Government Policy
> Makers in US and Asia exposed to me just how too few people understand the
> End2End principle.
>
> Q. Do you, when you work with "CII" activities, weave the End2End principle
> into your work?
>
> I know this was a major shift to my architectural practices for
> high-resilient systems. I'm wondering if is the same for anyone else.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CII mailing list
> CII at isotf.org
> http://isotf.org/mailman/listinfo/cii
>